Libraries, the universe and everything

Chartership and Certification event
February 22, 2012, 11:57
Filed under: Chartership, CPD, Events

On Tuesday 21st February I attended a Chartership and Certification event, which was run by Karen Poole from CDG and CILIP’s Michael Martin. You can see a live recording of a previous version of this event via the CILIP Bambuser channel, and there is a copy of the presentation linked from the right hand side of the portfolio-building courses page.I was quite pleased to discover that I’m actually a good way along the Chartership process – I have a mentor, a PPDP, a good range of evidence from things I’m backdating, and am well on track with my plan to complete the rest of it before the end of this year. The event was well-structured and enjoyable, I felt that Michael and Karen put everyone at ease and they answered all questions as they arose. The audience was composed of a wide range of people, from those of us already registered for Chartership or Certification through to others who wanted to know more about the process before taking the plunge. In addition to a step-by-step presentation from Michael, Karen led a more practical workshop and discussion session in which we were encouraged to put some of our new knowledge into practice.  

I took quite a few notes during the afternoon, but I’m not going to recount them all here – if you’re interested to know more please drop me a line via the comments. What follows are some thoughts about things which are most relevant to me at this stage of my Chartership journey.

I think it was Karen who mentioned that some people choose to structure their personal statement using the assessment criteria as sub-headings, and this gave me a real lightbulb moment. I’ve rather been avoiding thinking about how to organise my evidence (of which more below), and didn’t even consider the assessment criteria when I put my PPDP together. How I end up structuring my statement is still tbc, but what I intend to do now is revisit my PPDP and break it up according to the criteria, so I can see which elements I’ve covered and what I need to work on.

Evidence was a topic which came up a number of times, and this is something I haven’t really begun to address properly. I’ve got a file of paper certificates from courses I’ve attended, an email folder with some stuff in, and a folder on my work computer too. I’ve made some attempt to duplicate the content of these folders, but nothing systematic as yet. Michael recommended an online portfolio builder, which looks interesting, but I’m not keen to acquire yet another digital produce to maintain! What I really need to do is get everything together into the same place, which will probably be either Google docs or Evernote as I already have accounts and can access them from anywhere.

Skills audit
I’ve been saying I need to do a skills audit for some time, but haven’t got around to doing anything about it other than downloading a copy of the CPD audit template from the CILIP website. Michael recommended taking a look at the OU’s Safari or the Higher Education Academy skills audit and seeing if either was helpful – on a very brief glance I think I prefer the latter but I need to look into this further, and will certainly give one of them a go. I think this will be useful as it should identify areas which I need to work on, and help direct some of my learning and development activity over the next few months.

The most strongly-emphasised point of the whole event was to be sure that the portfolio matches all the criteria. The fact that the Chartership process is such a personal thing, and that portfolios can vary widely, is quite daunting as it implies a lack of hard-and-fast rules, and judging by some of the questions a number of other people in the room were also struggling with this a bit. Being reminded that there is a set of defined criteria to address has certainly helped me to focus my thinking about my portfolio, and has made me feel more confident about the whole process generally.


5 Comments so far
Leave a comment

I’m really pleased you found the afternoon useful. This blog is a very clear bit of reflection and It’s interesting to see how the criteria come across as something to hold on to when portfolios look so different from each other and we don’t specify how much or what evidence should go into the submission.


Comment by Michael Martin

Thanks Michael. I much prefer having instructions to work from, so realising that I can use the criteria in this way is really helpful to me – I guess some people prefer a more free-form approach though!


Comment by Emma Davidson

[…] was absolutely delighted with the response this received. As I’ve blogged about before, my current approach is haphazard, to say the least, and it appears that I am not alone in having a […]


Pingback by Chatting about Chartership « Libraries, the universe and everything

Hello there

I’ve found your blog via the CILIP Weekly Information World email. I liked your post and I would just like to suggest that in terms of skills audits it might be better to try the OU’s ‘Information Skills for Researchers’, there is a section on Skills Audits here

Penny Robertson (one of the librarians at Oxford Brookes and previously a librarian at The OU… :-))


Comment by pennylibrarian

Many thanks Penny, that’s really good to know about!


Comment by Emma Davidson

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: